Product development early on the S curve, exploring Anthropic Artifacts

Fraser Kelton: I don't think any founder ever goes into a major release for their company, not expecting the world to catch on fire, because for them it's the single most important thing, like, in their life.

I think it is so brilliant, not just because of it being a primitive that makes sense, it's aligned with, like, their strengths, right?

It is in service of the model, the model is the product.

Nabeel Hyatt: There's like one big dog, and then there's a bunch of little people. They're all lemmings. Trying to feed the one big dog.

That's obviously not true in the case of a core GPT like interface, a core chat interface that is still very early in the S curve.

And it's also very true in lots of other verticals where you really believe that there's rapid innovation.

[00:00:43] Welcome to Hallway Chat

Nabeel Hyatt: Hey, welcome. Welcome to Hallway Chat. I'm Fraser. I'm Nabeel. We should get started. You only have a little bit of time before you're taking your kids to go get the best tacos in the world.

Fraser Kelton: Le taq.

You got it. You got to do it. I got to spring this on you.

[00:00:58] Strong Convictions Loosely Held

Fraser Kelton: So a couple of times ago, you had this big rant that we're never going to even talk about models anymore. Models are no longer a thing. What was the first investment we made after that show? I don't know what you're talking about. Yeah. So, This is a confusing job because sometimes you have conviction about one way of viewing the world.

And then you meet a group who tells you what they want to do. Yeah. And you just got to reevaluate. Strong convictions loosely held. Strong convictions loosely held. I thought that was worth just dropping.

Nabeel Hyatt: Now, the unfortunate thing, of course, is like, there's probably some founder who didn't even listen to the podcast, by the way.

They saw the title, which I think was something like, should we just stop talking about models? They didn't even reach out. Like, we just lost, we just lost a wonderful founder we're going to work with because of that. No, I hope not. I hope not. I mean, we certainly are all trying to make sense out of the world right now.

Yeah. But, man, you gotta have humility. Like, the whole point of any good founder is that they have the chutzpah to tell the world that they're wrong about how they're thinking about the world, and then go do it my way, right? There you go.

Fraser Kelton: It's an interesting conversation, right, as to, as to why. Why we decided to have some loose beliefs.

I still laugh about that regularly.

Nabeel Hyatt: There's nothing more exciting to me than having a conviction or having a thesis and then have a founder walk in and say, Hey, have you ever thought about it this way? And just, you're just, Oh my God, never. That's amazing. And now you're have a new lens with which to process the world.

Fraser Kelton: I have heard you and Santo and others here basically say some semblance of that. Uh, where like the most exciting pitches have been where You have some ideas about technology trends and you've been interested in a few different things. And then some founder comes in and just lays out a vision for the future that you hadn't even contemplated.

It's

Nabeel Hyatt: one of the reasons why we keep the team relatively small here, right? We talked about it, which is just like, this is the problem with large companies. As large companies, the things that are loosely held become Written down as dogma, and then they're carried on, and then the person, the product manager who came up with the idea isn't even there anymore, but everybody else carries it on as dogma, and so it's no longer malleable, and I think there's a lot of that institutionalization and venture that has gone on, especially in the last five or seven years.

And that's super weird in a world where everything is changing right now, right?

Fraser Kelton: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Uh, and like the more process you have, the more you work against the process and like evaluate yourself against adhering to that. So on the topic of things being ambiguous and moving very quickly. Yeah.

[00:03:37] Exploring Claude Artifacts

Fraser Kelton: Anthropic Portfolio Company launches something that I think is just like too interesting not to discuss, and that's Claude Artifacts.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yeah. I mean, look, a little, We're going to talk a little of our own book, which I gave you crap about when you brought up talking about this today, but, but we're just, it's, it's user behavior with a thing that I am doing right now, and you were right to call it out, like.

Every day, I have a little post it note next to my laptop at home that says, Should you build an artifact for this? And it's because I'm trying to train myself. Just like a, whatever it was a couple of years ago, you're trying to train yourself to start searching in Perplexity versus searching in Google for something to get used to a new behavior.

Um, I have, every couple of days now, Oh, listen, man, I'm going to stop,

Fraser Kelton: like, I trust you enough, and myself enough, you are not, like, a, a, a shill, we are, like, authentic to a fault as to, like, who we are, and what we care about, and our values, like, we're talking about this because it's actually, like, exciting and awesome, exciting, yeah, yeah, yeah, why don't you tell a little bit about Claude Artifacts, set it up, what is it?

Nabeel Hyatt: So the typical version is, it's what GPT store should have been. Um, No, come on. No, no, no. Uh, so, uh,

Fraser Kelton: Claude. So I'll tell you, I'll tell you something that's very funny. Um, you asked, uh, in, in a recent episode, uh, of us talking, do you think it's still going to be a chat interface? Yeah. I said, like, hell no. Like the chance that Noah at OpenAI and team has stumbled on a chat interface is like, Noah, before we ended up on the ChatGPT enterprise, him and Val prototyped a version of Artifacts like, uh, yeah, it's just like, it's a very natural way that is like co create the Artifact is a great name.

It's a great name. Right. It's a great name. Yeah. But calling out that prescience and then your comment there is too funny.

Nabeel Hyatt: Thanks for pulling that to the foreground. And I did not know that. Awesome story. Um, yeah. Artifacts, very simply, uh, if you have not used it, you do need to go into Claude and have a paid account, and you have to turn it on.

You have to go into the bottom left corner, hit a button, go into settings, and turn it on manually. But, basically, if you then type into the chat interface a thing that would be represented in software and in a UI, It will render that thing on the right hand panel. So your interface changes from a single threaded chat, like it would normally be, to, I'm now going to build a little React app.

I'm going to render on the right hand side of the page, the thing that you're trying to talk about. And, and if you go now search artifacts and Claude on Twitter, you will see a whole bunch of wonderful things. You haven't already been exposed to this, of people experimenting with this idea. Um, I did some fun experiments with it that were completely unproductive.

I've done some generative art, just like algorithmic art, for probably 20 years now, off and on as a side project. And so I had it make some algorithmic art for me, where it was just rendering, uh, little line drawings. And then had it render above those line drawings, parameterizations, so that I could type in, for instance, like, how many squares should it render per second, and a little slider that I could move back and forth.

, for me, the first, like, simple, user controllable instantiation of this thing that, that we would, like, academically call malleable software. Yeah,

Fraser Kelton: that's right. So let's see if we can even just come at that from a slightly different angle. Sure. Yeah. You have your chat dialogue.

Yep. And you say, I want to write a memo about X, Y, and Z. We don't write memos, so I don't know why I came up with that. But, uh, it then creates what looks like the equivalent of a Word document. Yes. And, and rather than in the chat dialogue, having the document appear. Yep. It is an artifact. It is, it is a piece of the UI that is pegged on the, on the side of the window.

And then you can iterate and riff on. Uh, on the output with the model through chat. And so you can say like, Oh, actually the first paragraph is a little bit more verbose than I'd like it to be. Can you tighten it up? And actually, can you make the entire theme to be more about X rather than Y?

Nabeel Hyatt: Right.

Fraser Kelton: And then rather than having to have it just like spit out the content into the chat window again, it just basically updates.

The, the artifact, like it's

Nabeel Hyatt: a great name, it's such a great name. Yeah, and that's what I mean by, you know, this concept of malleable software. Yeah. Which is, you're not really coding, you're still speaking to the chat agent. That's it. But the chat agent is writing code and then executing code and then showing that code to you as a part of the overall process.

So, the simple one I've actually used a lot is, Part of the summer, one of the summer projects I've been doing with my kids is trying to finish this deck building game that we've been working on for a little while, that we built almost entirely with AI, and not like AI art, AI balancing, AI content, like, like we've been trying to use every AI tool possible, and this is like the vessel for that, so this involves a lot of mid journey prompting.

For the art itself across a lot of different categories of types of characters and types of art, and we've built almost like an internal nomenclature and language amongst us for, how do you describe the foreground and the background? Basically a prompt. Yeah. Language. Okay.

So I had it built a little UI toolkit. Okay. A mid journey. Prompt engineering thing just for my game where it's basically a bunch of checkboxes you pick oh Is this a scientist or an engineer right and then it like inserts the little six word thing that we even can't be that makes it Look the way it's supposed to look and so I turn what is normally A was a bunch of Google spreadsheets with a bunch of words in them that we're copying and pasting over and over and over again and getting really bored at into a simple web view interface checkbox that we just like go through really quickly and speeds us up like crazy.

Fraser Kelton: Okay,

Nabeel Hyatt: so, um,

Fraser Kelton: it's awesome. They've done a great job as well, because you talked about the ability to share and remix it. Yeah. That launched, you know, a couple of weeks after they introduced the main feature, and it was in response to what their users were kind of like pulling the product into that direction.

Nabeel Hyatt: And I think a similar one that we can probably tack on to this that's aside of this is the concept of projects, which they also launched recently. Which goes very well with artifacts, right? So projects, very simply, if you haven't looked at it is sensibly, I can have a repository of chats inside of one metastructure with a bunch of documents and things that are inside of it.

So if I think I'm going to keep talking about a project over and over again, so in the context of Spark, maybe we're working on a deal and we're thinking about a new area of research, and so we have. Five white paper PDFs that we wanna put in there, and then we started a bunch of texts against them and we wanted to go back to the same knowledge over and over again.

Yeah, you can start a project instead. And then all these things seem to layer very, none of them are like huge, huge. They're all not things that nobody would've ever thought of before, but they layer very well into each other because obviously if you're making an artifact. an artifact would sit inside of a project so it had access to all of these PDFs and other things that these knowledge and then what you want is sharing obviously of a project with an artifact and that's the thing that launches later and they kind of like overlap really naturally.

Fraser Kelton: It's great and so I'm just smiling because you said that like it's not stuff that people wouldn't have thought about earlier I'm just laughing I'm like we should just go talk to Noah it to figure out what we all should be launching in like two to three years.

[00:10:48] S Curve Product Design

Fraser Kelton: I think for this conversation what is really interesting to talk about is product strategy and how to think about that depending on where you are on the S curve.

And so a couple of times ago, we were like, Hey, how is this all going to play out? And we commented on Diane at Anthropx comment that like, depended on where you are in the S curve. Yeah. And then we were framing it through that point of view. I think that artifacts and then the world's response to it, is the first strong evidence that we are very early in the S curve.

Why do you say that? ChatGPT comes out as just a chat dialogue, sets the world on fire. Sure. We are even discussing, do we think chat is the final ei Right? Of course we don't think it is. No. This is the first time where we have seen product of this sort introduce a meaningful new element to the ei. A new, A new primitive, a new PRI primitive, right?

Nabeel Hyatt: There's lots of people building new, entirely new interface's on top of Chatt, BT blah blah, or new verticals. We see lots of that. No, but this is a new, A new primitive what? A new primitive.

Fraser Kelton: But also like the product is that broad consumer AI product, right? Like what we said is like what will. us and our siblings and our parents be using when they think of an AI product in three years time.

Yep. And this is the first time where we've seen a new UI really resonate. in this type of product experience.

Nabeel Hyatt: Why do you think it does? We can get back to the s curve thing in just a second. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But like, I just want us to like reflect for a second on what it is about what they did here that we're impressed with and that we teach, that would teach a founder any lesson or like, what lessons do we take away from this that we might apply to the other founders we work with and the other products we're working with?

Yeah, I'm not privy to anything that they do.

Fraser Kelton: Like the thought that they put into it, but I've, I've sat through and worked through it with Noah when we did like basically a prototype of this, and it is a very natural way, like, what are you using ChatGPT for or Claude for? It is to create, software. It is to create an essay.

It is to create, like in your case, the prompt generator for mid journey, like a little bit of software and app. And these things don't get it right in, in first shot, zero shot, like any good project, you have to volley it back and forth and you have to co create it with the AI. Yeah. And this is a The first time where the co creation happens in a way where you are playing more of the editor role and it is then going to do all of the heavy work behind the scenes and showing you the product, the byproduct of

Nabeel Hyatt: the work.

I agree with everything you just said except I'd push back slightly as you were just talking about it. I thought the other instantiation of this is code interpreter. Yeah, yeah, yeah, sure. I think, you know, The other thing that feels very similar to this, that chat PT pulled off is when I'm making charts and graphs Yeah.

And things like that. Yeah. And data analysis inside of chatt. Like it has the same

Fraser Kelton: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Feeling. Listen, listen. The, the, I thought that the chat GT launch at the embedded, uh, tables or charts or whatever it. Yeah. Was, was directionally aligned with this. Yes. And, and beautifully done. Yeah, I agree.

Do you know who did that? Who did that? Noah. Of course. Of course. You are now editing the output and the AI agent or, or, uh, assistant. Yeah. Is doing all of the work for you. Yeah. And presenting it in a way that's easier for you to, like, critique it. Yeah, right. So you back to the S curve. Yeah. Um, I think it is so brilliant, not just because of it being a primitive that makes sense.

It's aligned with like their strengths, right? It is in service of the model. The model is the product. All of those things. It's brilliant in how they introduced it. And we've had this discussion before is like when you're in a mystery versus a puzzle moment, what is the right approach to product strategy?

Yeah. And I'll ask that to you, uh, and then frame it in the context of what they've done with artifacts.

Nabeel Hyatt: The question is just, how certain are you at how right you are? Right. And the thing that happens for a late stage Red Ocean market, is that you have talked to all the customers, you know what all of your competitors are doing, um, you kind of have a sense of what's going to happen for the next year, because everything's kind of slow, and things don't get released that often, and , it's a known market with known customers.

And when you get something right, you kind of know it and it's very durable. And so you want to do, you know, if you're a person releasing a new first person shooter for the PlayStation.

Fraser Kelton: Yeah.

Nabeel Hyatt: We know the history of all the first person shooters. We know all the other first person shooters. You know what you can do research on what casual versus hardcore users think about in terms of like time to kill and like reload while waits.

And like, you can just go so deep that you do the research. And you do a big, huge launch, right? You have utter ideal certainty about what you're trying to do if you've done the work. And much like a puzzle, you can just do more work deeper to get to the answer. I paint that picture because I think people can understand what that feels like, right?

And then, So, AI, if you pass it the opposite direction, is different in almost every market, even static markets, even older markets, right now, as we're trying to figure out how it is going to transform those markets. There are some markets where it's It's not going to do enough. Uh, the incumbents are going to sprinkle in a few little things, and they're going to, and it's just, there's no, it's not going to be disruptive enough for a new startup to do a thing.

That's obviously not true in the case of a core GPT like interface, a core chat interface that is still very early in the S curve. Yep. And it's also very true in lots of other verticals where you really believe that they're disrupting innovation. Right. In a world where, uh, It's disruptive innovation.

Yeah, what do you do? You have to match your marketing and your product velocity to your certainty. That you're right. And your certainty should be low. Right. It has to be confident when you're trying to pitch a VC or hire a new VP or whatever that like you've got a, you've got a read on the future. But the cone of uncertainty on that read has to be very wide.

Right. You're really certain about next month. You're really uncertain about next year. We're, we're moving through the curve. And if that's happening, if you're early in the S curve, then the answer is that everything should map to that uncertainty. Right. So it should be a tweet, not a launch party. Right.

It should be baked for a couple of weeks. Not, uh, six months. It should feel in every way you should communicate to the customer that they are also early with you on the journey. You know, the, the, the late S curve adoption company, the last mover advantage company of all time is Apple. And you can just look at everything as a rubric of how Apple launches or does a thing.

And if you believe you are actually early in an S curve, then you should be doing the opposite of everything Apple does with a launch. Right. And, and that means you should try to feel more amateur, you should try to feel more authentic, you should try to feel more familial, you should try to tell them this is a beta, this is a labs, this is going to change next week, and you're going to try and ship regularly because you're not trying to tell people that the story is done, you're trying to get them to turn the page, you're trying to, you're trying to hook them and then give them a new page next week, and a new page a month later.

So that they're going to be on the journey as this market develops. That's right. Not to try and present yourself as the next Salesforce or the next blah, blah, blah. Yeah. You're just saying it's early, it's crazy, come on the journey. Like it intuitively makes sense. And by the way, it's also self evident in AI because in a way that it's not normally with Because if it was a, if it was all baked.

Right now on first launch, then that would almost necessarily be a sustaining innovation, which almost necessarily means it's not a startup opportunity, so you shouldn't be doing it. Yeah, yeah, for sure. So if it's, if it's a startup opportunity, it's probably crazy and insane, and it's probably still malleable and still soft clay, and so you should just communicate that to users, and so you should, like the old story I tell a lot about this that I really have respect for is, Which I probably even said on this podcast before, because you get to the point where you start selling stories over and over again.

But like, Oculus after the acquisition by Facebook, now Meta, I thought they did an excellent job at the third version of the Rift, I think it was, which was the first version released after the acquisition. And I think they read the market incredibly well, which was that everybody after a, you know, unicorn plus acquisition is like, Oh my God, VR is here.

And internally, that was not the conversation. Internally, as we are very early in the S curve, it is not ready for prime time. Everybody is getting way too overhyped. And so that first version, which could have been as pretty and wonderful and amazing as an Apple product, obviously they had the budget for resources.

The first version that came out afterwards was a simple cardboard box. Love it. And, and, like, dialed as down as possible. You wanted to have high expectations,

Fraser Kelton: right? Because, whatever that expression is, is like, life is really about how, whether you meet, exceed, or fall short of expectations. Yeah. And that's really what this is about.

You There's the other expression that like, uh, a startup is an idea maze and like the, the one path where you're saying if you, if you are confident that you're toward the top of the S curve and you know what users want and you can like map that roadmap out for 12 months and then just tick it off and have a big launch event that's anchored with the product release.

Yeah. Um, that's like saying, Go three steps forward, take a left, five steps forward, take a right through the maze. Like, if you already know the map to the maze, you can do that. Right. But nobody knows that in this world. And so you need to kind of meander and see what, where the path takes you. Yeah. And that's what they did.

Nabeel Hyatt: I'll give, like, I think they've actually done a very good job of coordinating this as well. That's right. Like, they've, they're, this is, they've released most of these features with, uh, Simple Tweets, small webpages, very little fanfare, just like, Well, they call it a labs release.

Fraser Kelton: Yeah. Uh, and, and there's like a permanent icon that you always have to like, confront in the product.

That's like, you have this labs feature enabled, like a reminder. This is a labs feature. Uh, it, it may disappear. It may underwhelm. It may not be here tomorrow. It certainly is not going to promise you all sorts of crazy things, but have a go with it. And, and

Nabeel Hyatt: I was, I thought also in the past at certain times, similarly, like I think.

Open AI has, for many of their best features, it has been this kind of like, you know, Greg tweets a thing, sit, like it's a simple thing. You put it out there. And for sure ver there are counter example, you know, the GPT store, which, which like was a counter example. Yeah. Where they really, yeah, the gravity was quite high.

They, yeah. This is a thing. This is the huge, you know, uh, and, and ironically maybe one of their, I, I personally would say maybe one of their worst releases. I'm kidding. And it mapped to very high fanfare. You don't have to say anything about it. I'm just here to put you in

Fraser Kelton: awkward situations. I will say at the, the launch of ChatGPT was two weeks after Galactica or whatever that meta thing was, which was a chat, but yeah, of course you're looking at me like, what the hell are you talking about?

Nobody knows what it was. It was a meta release from their AI team, which was a chat model that you could interact with. And it was, uh, it was pushed out through the science team or something like that. Okay. And their team was publicly saying this is going to revolutionize the way that science gets done.

Three days later, they had to pull it. Oh, I remember that. The comms team, Hannah and Steve, were like, no, no, no. Like, we're going to call this thing, rightfully so, a research preview. Right. And then we're going to be like, tamper down the expectations.

Nabeel Hyatt: Do you think without Galactica messing up publicly, bravado, chest thumping, Do you think that ChatGPT may have been more, no, it was destined to be on a low key release.

That,

Fraser Kelton: that, that, that was, that was the, uh, it was a low key release that has been the MO from like Stephen Henn on many things of that nature. Like, yeah, yeah, yeah, for sure. For sure.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yeah. They're, they're, they're great at what they do. You know, one of the things that we just talked about, it is just the feeling that feels amazing when you get this right.

is one of stacking wins on top of each other. And I'm curious, you've been inside of high performance organizations. It feels so great as a consumer when you get that feeling, but

Fraser Kelton: it feels like so few companies do that. I'll come at it from a different perspective first. Sure. Uh, and, and

[00:23:33] The Instinct to Exhale: Post-Launch Reflections

Fraser Kelton: we were talking earlier.

This week, internally, about how a founder had teed up a very large release, and then it kind of felt like, you know, the air escaping a balloon, you know, at the end. Yeah, that's right. That's right. And the comment was like, oh, I think their expectations were a little bit out of whack. And I don't think any founder ever goes into a major release for their company not expecting the world to catch on fire.

Because for them, it's the single most important thing, like, in their life. And they wouldn't be doing it. I think, actually, the likelihood that you deliver something that actually resonates is rare. Yes. Right? Yes. And, and, and what's the response? If you deliver something that resonates and catches the world in a small way on fire, that's rare.

What's the, what's the instinct? Right. Right.

Nabeel Hyatt: Well, I think the instinct is to exhale. Honestly, like it's just so hard to ever get something that resonates that I think the instinct is to, to quote unquote, take advantage of it. Uh huh. By now we get to go, we were all taking a bunch of incredibly risky bets to try and get this thing out in the world.

Yeah. High, super high beta. I don't know if it's going to work, but if it kind of works, then every instinct is to have the pendulum swing the other way. Now we get to go, okay, it's out. Somebody cares. Yeah. Now we can talk to engineering. who is completely stressed out. That's right. And we just did an offsite where we all like, I don't know, got a home in Tahoe and lived together for six weeks to get this thing out the door.

Everybody slept four hours a night for six weeks. It's finally out there. Now we're going to bug fix.

Fraser Kelton: Yep. That's it. Now we're going to stabilize,

Nabeel Hyatt: right? Is this where you're going? Yeah.

Fraser Kelton: Yeah. Right. It's like, we're going to stabilize it. We're going to do bug fixing. We can now have a six month roadmap. We can build up out the robustness

Nabeel Hyatt: of that one product.

[00:25:25] Balancing Innovation and Stability

Nabeel Hyatt: And this is another good example where if you're late in the S curve. And you think it's an enduring innovation that was going to last for a real, it's fine. Yeah. But most of the time that's the wrong call. A

Fraser Kelton: hundred percent. Yeah. Most of the time I think it's a hundred percent the wrong call. Yeah. Like, yeah, I, I, I,

Nabeel Hyatt: I don't know.

There's counters. I said, well, listen, like, you know, eBay had one trick. Right? eBay has one trick. eBay released a, they had one product innovation, and after that, I'm not saying they were all in very good strategic choices that needed to be made, and a lot of scaling, and a lot of tactical shit, but like, it is basically the same website it's been since 1997, right?

Yeah, they're

Fraser Kelton: lucky they didn't disappear because of the, the network effects of a marketplace. Sure. Like, uh, otherwise they'd be gone.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yeah.

Fraser Kelton: Um, you know, this, I spent some months at Airbnb wondering like, A single Airbnb, it's a search box. That's right. Single page. I spent some time wondering, like, how are there organizations like these that exist versus an Apple and Amazon and Facebook that can punch, punch, punch, punch, punch.

Yeah. And I think it does come back to this. Like, I think the, the rare ones are the ones that you cited where they do one thing and they, they strike gold, so to speak, and then they can just ride that. And those require network effects of some form or another where you, like, you just can't mess it up, right?

Versus the truly iconic companies, they don't deliver something that catches fire and then, like, let's do a week of bug fixing, let's do a week of, like, stabilization efforts, and then let's get to work on, like, the roadmap of long tail feature requests. It is really hard

Nabeel Hyatt: to be a CEO and make that ask, though, right?

But you're right, you're right.

[00:27:00] Leaning into risk

Nabeel Hyatt: You know, Facebook comes out. And they get traction, and then you see the Facebook feed, you see the Facebook connect, where they were trying to authenticate logins across the rest of the internet, you see Facebook apps, you see Facebook coins, like, it was, it was, High risk product release after high risk product release

Fraser Kelton: for years.

I used to think of it as you want to find the red hot core of your product and everything else on the periphery is kind of irrelevant. You and I, when we've talked about it before, it's like, what is it that you're polishing and polish matters? Uh, I think about it as you need to get the red hot core. And then the next thing is not to go build out the adjacent features.

It's like, how do you get that red hot core hotter, bigger, And, and that is like the, the Facebook newsfeed was a high risk thing because it put the previous Red Hot Core at risk. And it took real founder conviction to, like, look at it and realize it was the right thing to do and push it out.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yeah, yeah, for people who aren't, don't have the history of it, you know, Facebook at launch looks a lot like MySpace.

It's a profile page. That's right. It's not even a feed yet, and it was working. And so you had to kind of throw out, you know, The paradigm of what worked after it was already working in order to find the next paradigm. And I think there's examples of that, some examples of that happening in companies today, but you're right.

The natural inclination is when something starts to work, your instinct is to build the scaffolding around it immediately. Your instinct is to bug fix, now we'll go build the SDK to that, the API to that. We'll go broad. Or the other thing, which is I don't think we're saying at all, is You, you don't do things that are orthogonal to the Red Hot Core.

You don't suddenly say, great, now we make shoes. Like, it's like, like it is, how do we double down on the Red Hot Core? But like, how do we take another big, huge risk? That's it. On top of the thing that just is working, which is

Fraser Kelton: smart. You started this entire thing by like, you take a beat or you take a breath.

And I actually think you should take a beat and take a breath in the sense that I don't think you should do anything. And then you should start. experimenting as quickly as you can to figure out what is the next thing that pushes like the RedHotCore forward and bigger and like burns brighter. Who do you think is doing that right now in AI?

I think 11 Labs, right? Like, I think you can argue that they launch long form audio, text to speech, then they do dubbing, and then they do a consumer app, and then they do licensed voices within a consumer app, like, it is pushing and pushing and pushing and pushing and pushing. You might be able to make an argument that, like, there's a little bit of, like, okay, let's go and make shoes at this point.

Yeah, how much are they going after

Nabeel Hyatt: different versus

Fraser Kelton: doubling down on the center? How much of this is like, the Facebook example was like so great. Yep. Right? It just, it pushed in the same aligned direction around the mission and the vision with like the one product.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yep. I think Descript has been doing this for a long time as well.

Okay. Like, they had transcription, knew it was going to be a commodity some number of years later, and they have continued to ship, like, innovation after innovation after innovation. Whereas the counter example for me is like, AI meeting bots, generally. Uh huh. Yeah. Right? Like there's a whole bot companies, and most of them came out with a single interesting good idea.

And how much have they changed since then, other than just building out the cruft on the edges? Well, you, you lumped one that basically came back to the

Fraser Kelton: world. Yeah. And said, we can't, we can't make this bigger, better, bolder. That's right. That direction. And so we're going to go plumb some

Nabeel Hyatt: other, uh, other areas.

That's actually very true. Right? Yeah. Co pilot. It was one you mentioned the other day that is also a great example. GitHub Copilot, they launched something that's profound.

Fraser Kelton: Yes. Right? Creates an entirely new market. I think they're still killing it on revenue. Sure. I think they did like half of what you should do.

They, they sort of, GitHub next where they have all sorts of like crazy science experiments happening and it's clear that these are science experiments, right? And I don't that sounds good Yeah, it sounds good Whether or not it's because they haven't been running the right experiments or they just haven't been able to find something that resonates Like they haven't pushed beyond the first co pilot.

Yep, or I mean like in any meaningful way. Yep, right? I don't know. We meet a lot of founders who roll their eyes and like scoff at them That's probably not The place that you want to have in the market you want to have like fear

Nabeel Hyatt: although let's be clear They're also because they're The founder is trying to take, no, co pilot down there.

Fraser Kelton: I think there's no, I, there was a moment where like, people were really fearful of Google. Yeah. Yeah. And they were like, fearful of them for good reason. That's right. And, but that

Nabeel Hyatt: was like 10 years ago. No, no, no, no, no. But, but I'm saying like, there are moments, why were they fearful of Google at that time?

It's the same thing that we were just talking about. It was the, it's a few, you know, you launch Google, it's working. And then suddenly you get to this like thoroughbred horse stage where you're like, Gmail launches, Google Maps launches, like Android phones, like they're just stacking win after win. That's right.

You don't get a win for seven years and

Fraser Kelton: things are

Nabeel Hyatt: different.

Fraser Kelton: That's right. Nobody is concerned they're up there like kill zone for, for a really unfortunate term. Right? Yep. Right. It's like, this is clearly should be in GitHub's roadmap and we don't care because they're morons.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yeah. Whether they're right or wrong, they're not

Fraser Kelton: striking fear into everybody.

That's right. That's right. You know, we don't have a good rebuttal to that. Right. We're like, yeah, yeah. All right. Like, yeah, like they, they have not done much. Um, and this is quite interesting. Yep.

[00:32:30] Question: Getting introd to the wrong partner at a VC

Fraser Kelton: I have a question from venture perspective that might be useful for founders. Yeah. Hit me. What do you do if you come into the partnership or the firm through one partner and then you realize during the process that it's, it's not the right partner.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yep. It depends on the firm. Okay. Like, like, you, you know, this obviously from Spark standpoint, there's like, you know, there's seven early stage partners, flat. There's not a lot of credit. We all just play together. It's easy. The simple version is like, if you go look at the website and you think about the number of investors and it's relatively small, then there's probably not a whole lot of problems switching unless.

You can kind of quickly get the read that there's like sometimes the smaller partnerships you get the there's really it's like a one person firm There's like one big dog right and then there's a bunch of little people right in which case ironically It's actually pretty easy to switch because they're all lemmings trying to feed the one big dog Okay, and and so that's actually fine, and then there are times where it is A big, large firm, you're just screwed.

That's just the fact of it is like, it's an attribution culture. If you are trying to scale a very large firm, then credit needs to be attributed appropriately to figure out who I'm supposed to promote. And so there's some CRM somewhere that as soon as you made a phone call or had a coffee or showed up at a dinner, it's their job to tag as many humans as possible so that if one of those humans becomes an IPO, they might get promoted.

Good. And so other partners know that and you're screwed. I'd say the easy test for this, though, is at least as a founder, I want to feel like the whole team is helping me anyway. And so I would just be honest with the partner about switching to another partner. Right. And saying, I think this other person might be a better fit.

And then, by the way, if they're not okay with that, or you get the heebie jeebies or whatever, that is telling you an awful lot about this relationship. That is informative to you in picking what firm you want to work with. So I think it's great either way. If it screws it, I guess, as a founder, if it screws it for me, I'd be like, Awesome, I just learned something that I wouldn't have learned otherwise about their relationship anyway.

Fraser Kelton: That's a great way of framing it, and what I have been saying to founders, whenever there's like a hard question that comes up, is like, okay, you know, this is the start of what should be a very long term great relationship. That will be defined by working through a series of very hard problems. And so how we're going to work through X, Y, or Z is going to set things

Nabeel Hyatt: up.

So let's get to work. Even better framing. Yeah.

Fraser Kelton: You

Nabeel Hyatt: just presented yourself with a conflict. Awesome. All the relationship is with the board over a period of time is trying to learn how to work through good conflicts in good ways. That's right. And listen, I've had to work through

Fraser Kelton: that in the, in the inverse.

right? And we've done, we've done versions of that where it's like, okay, listen, why, why, why do we think it's the, the different partner might be helpful? Yep. And in that case, like, you understand there's like, there's FUD, there's like real valid concerns. There's all sorts of like different things that help as you work through, just like any of these things, you can like cut

Nabeel Hyatt: through to the core of the issue and then just address it.

We've absolutely had these conversations with the founder where it's like, Oh, I think this other partner, we've certainly done the. Uh, it could be either of us. You pick. Doesn't matter. Sure. And then there are other situations where you try to talk to the founder, and they're like, Well, I think it should be X person, and you're like, Why?

And you listen to the answers, and you're like, Uh, I don't know if your head's on straight on this one, man. Like, I think you're getting bad advice for these reasons. Let's talk it through.

Fraser Kelton: Yeah, that makes sense. Uh, Two other things. Sure, man. We have, we have non AI products. Oh, yes, we do. In our lives. In our lives.

Nabeel Hyatt: I'll go first. We can't, we can't help but apply our own sense of product nerdery to all the things. That's right. I'll

Fraser Kelton: go first. My wife and I bought a Roborock, some sort of horrible name. Roborock Max V8 Supra or something like that. It is a robot vacuum mop. Okay, that then has a, uh, kind of a iRobot y thing.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sure. Um, but better. Okay. Okay. Why is it better? Listen, it's the same as iRobot. It's got like a docking station where it returns to and it empties the vacuum. It empties the dirty mop water and it refills the mop water. It has LiDAR, so it navigates around your house. It identifies with AI objects in the way and navigate around them and stuff like that.

I'm bringing this up because it is a life changer. We're pulling out of the house with the kids. Yeah. And you just be like, Oh yeah, let's clean the floor. And you hit the button and it goes out and does it. But I'm bringing it up very quickly because a lot of discussion over the past year has been around the role that robots are going to have in our lives.

And like, A big branch of effort, both from founders and investors, has gone into humanoid robots. And there's like the, I don't know, what's the trite, uh, almost insufferable comment that like, The human world is built for humans, and so therefore you want to have a robot that's built. Yep. It does the job miraculously well, like amazingly well.

It costs not the same amount of a humanoid. Right. Right. And yeah, we have stairs in our house and you know what we do? Yeah. We carry it up or down the stairs and we hit the button. Yeah. And the cost is so low. That like, eventually, undoubtedly, is so great of a product

Nabeel Hyatt: that we'll just buy another one. Well, there's two things that I think are worth touching on.

One is, we spend a lot of time thinking about how to make things magical for consumers so they have no effort. And instead, I think the better way to build product is, if you have created a truly magical, wonderful new thing, users will meet you halfway. They will do things to get there. This is especially true in AI.

Think about the crap you have to go through to get to mid journey in Discord to use that product. And many other people would have said, no, the only way to launch this product is an iPhone app because I have to meet users where they are. Make sense out of those two, uh, dichotomies. And the truth is that like, if it's really magical, users will, again, early in the S curve, crazy new thing.

They'll, they'll jump through hoops. It's okay. Late in the S curve, it's marginally different than the next player. You better meet them exactly where they are. For

Fraser Kelton: sure. We got like a new outlet installed. Like we, we like, we moved heaven and hell. Yeah, that actually is a great way to bring it back. It's like, I've always thought that, like, I remember jumping through so many hoops to get free music.

Yep. Right. Oh, yeah. Because it was almost impossible to get digital music in the moment in time. Yep. And it was just so profound to appreciate exactly what you just said firsthand as an end user. We're like, I will move heaven and hell if the experience is worth worthwhile. Yeah, like the signup friction.

I hate, I hate when somebody has a horrible product and they decide they're like, no, the funnel, the funnels we need to fix because people are not converting. So the flip other side of this

Nabeel Hyatt: late in the s curve product is is the coffee machine, which of which there's millions of them, and they all serve different uses.

I use, uh, Comoteer sometimes. Frozen coffee. It's awesome. Highly recommended. I have still so yeah, I use a spin coffee for making espressos like pour over coffee. There is no better product in the world than the XBloom, which I know I've been talking to you like crazy. They released a second version. Okay.

I have not used a consumer product that has made it. Impeccable choices. And everybody who just wants AI stuff and software stuff could just turn off the podcast right now. Cause now we're talking about coffee machines, but like, it's a great example of something that for an early stage startup that is early in the S curve, I would have pushed back pretty hard on basically every product choice they made.

But for where they are, it was like every single product choice was great, which is to say it already made great coffee. It still makes the same coffee that it made in last year's version, but they have made like four or five. Adjusted, small, iterative choices. They changed the architecture of the, the, the framing of the product.

So just three things. The framing of the product so that it was a little less fussy and a little more clean. Great. That sounds simple. It's not simple. They added an LE, LED to the front that actually explains what it's doing with these wonderful tactical knobs that feel awesome to turn back and forth.

They actually even

Fraser Kelton: look nice to touch. They,

Nabeel Hyatt: they are, and they like, and it's a great texture on it. Yep. Great choice. They lifted up the place where the grounds come out by like a half an inch so that less grounds go out. And then they added a little drip tray, which hides some of the grounds so that you, so the whole thing looks cleaner.

Yep. And then there's a one or two other things. They're all great. I'd probably half of you didn't listen to half those things. All I can say is that, that if you were in their Discord channel and you were listening to the user feedback, this was like incredibly good refined product choices that are perfect for this kind of product.

Fraser Kelton: I own the first version of it. Yeah. It is probably the product that has brought me most happiness before my Roborock. Yep. Very long time. Yep. And you just ticked off all of the little minor annoyances that I have with what is already the best product. In my life.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yeah, well done. Yeah. Yeah. But again, this is a good example of like, understanding where you are in product development drives different.

And I didn't know where we were going to get there, but we somehow linked it all together. Like adding a drip

Fraser Kelton: tray, if you were at like the bottom of the S curve would be insufferable. Yes. Right? Yeah. But like, they've already gotten way up there. If it's the

Nabeel Hyatt: very first coffee machine, you don't then spend the next six months thinking about drip tray design

Fraser Kelton: this, this knob has a nice tactile feel to it. Yeah. Which is hard because we all love a good knob, let's be clear. Yeah, but that's true, but the coffee is great. Yeah. Highly recommend. It's an expensive machine. I think if we're riffing on that type of stuff, maybe it's a sign that we need to be done.

Nabeel Hyatt: Yep.

Alright. Thanks everybody. As always, if you see an AI product worth chatting about, let us know. Talk to you later. See ya.